External Combustion
Yet another Tesla lawsuit is on the table again, and this time it’s a plaintiff in Oregon filing the case. Maria Salcedo filed a lawsuit alleging that her Tesla vehicle suddenly caught fire while she was driving on January 8, 2025.
Details aren’t all there, however, because the lawsuit doesn’t mention the particular model that caught fire early last year. The plaintiff alleges that she was driving with her children and friend, Jewlien Battles, when the vehicle suddenly caught fire without warning and any external impact.
Based on the other Tesla lawsuits, a fire usually comes after a crash, regardless of whether it was caused by the driver or the Autopilot system. In this case, however, the lawsuit alleges that the impact occurred only after the vehicle spontaneously combusted. In other words, the fire was what caused the accident, not the result of it.
Tesla
There Was An Accident… After
According to the lawsuit, the sequence of events in this case is alleged to be: combustion first, accident after. After the vehicle suddenly caught fire, the plaintiff lost control of the Tesla and crashed into a median barrier. Thankfully, the doors kept working, which allowed the occupants to get out.
Maria Salcedo, the plaintiff, claims that she suffered a concussion, experienced severe psychological trauma, and underwent surgery as a result of her injuries. Salcedo also claims that she still has nightmares and anxiety following the crash and the fire.
In addition, “Mr. Jewlien Battles acted heroically by helping Maria Salcedo and her children escape the burning vehicle,” the lawsuit reads. Because of this, Battles suffered a concussion and second-degree burns on his hands, arms, neck, and abdomen.
“He [Battles] was transported to the emergency room and received treatment, including multiple follow-up visits. His medical provider has confirmed his burn scars are permanent,” according to the lawsuit.
Tesla
Technological Defects, Payable Damages
The lawsuit asserts that the fire was “caused by technological defects in the vehicle’s battery or energy management system.” The blame is once again shifted to Tesla, and the plaintiffs are seeking damages from the company.
These include: “general damages in an amount to be determined in trial, not less than $250,000, economic damages, including but not limited to medical expenses, in excess of $50,000, and non-economic damages for pain, suffering, and emotional distress in an amount exceeding $500,000.”
Tesla
Â